Please see the new Press Release from the Council of the Haida Nation on Trudeau’s announcement. According to CHN President Peter Lantin:
“There has to be a better government-to-government consultation process to deal with these projects before they get rolling,” said Lantin. “Avoiding this type of confrontation through frank dialogue will result in more common ground. Protecting the coast and the waters surrounding Haida Gwaii is paramount for our Nation. But within this framework there is room to develop practical solutions and resolve issues nation-to-nation and to do that we have to talk.”
Haida Raid 3 needs your support! This stop motion animation project is a home-grown Haida and non-Haida production — Puppet Activism that takes on Harper and his cronies on the Northern Gateway Pipeline and the expansion of oil tanker traffic on the Northwest Coast. A collaboration between K’alts’idaa K’ah (Laughing Crow) Productions, a storytelling society founded by the Haida carvers Jaalen and Gwaai Edenshaw and Dr. Ken Leslie, an educator and neuroscientist, Haida Raid 3 will feature music from Juno winning musician Alida Kinnie Starr. This year’s theme, “Save Our Waters” is a song from Kinnie that brings into focus what’s at stake in this new round of threats to our ocean from large-scale industrial development.
The collaborators in Haida Raid 3 have launched an Indiegogo campaign to support their work and we invite you to check it out. It has many different levels of rewards for your contributions, including bronze, silver, and gold castings of the characters in the production to Haida prints and stickers. Please help raise funds to make this project a success and send a clear message to the government that we want a healthy coastal economy not an industrial disaster waiting to happen!
Check out the Haida Raid 3 Save Our Waters Indiegogo campaign at:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/haida-raid-3-save-our-waters
]]>
HAIDA GWAII: Haida Gwaii CoASt is disappointed that the JRP approved Enbridge’s pipeline that would bring oil supertankers to Northern BC. Island communities came together to participate in the hearings and almost 200 spoke directly to the panel. Every single speaker stated his or her vehement opposition to Enbridge’s proposal for countless different reasons.
Haida Gwaii relies heavily on wild foods from the ocean and land. An oil spill puts all of that at risk and Island communities are not prepared to accept that risk. Haida Gwaii communities – both Haida and non-Haida – hold strong stewardship values. With a tradition of working together, we are committed to protecting our home from unsustainable, large-scale development projects. This was very clear at the JRP hearings – the Islands are strong and united against the Northern Gateway. Enbridge does not have social license for this project.
“The Panel’s recommendation doesn’t reflect our values. This whole project is absurd from start to finish – it’s totally destructive. We will not allow oil supertankers through our waters and we’re not backing down”, declared Gwaai Edenshaw.
“’The Haida Nation is the rightful heir to Haida Gwaii. Our culture is born of respect; and intimacy with the land and sea and the air around us. Like the forests, the roots of our people are intertwined such that the greatest troubles cannot overcome us. We owe our existence to Haida Gwaii.’ That’s from the preamble of our Constitution and that says it all,” explained April Churchill, former Vice-President of the Haida nation. “We have love and respect for Haida Gwaii, the Earth, and all of its beings. We will persevere in unity.”
Contacts
Haida Gwaii CoASt Spokesperson, April Churchill:
250.559.2332 | [email protected]
Haida Gwaii CoASt Spokesperson, Gwaai Edenshaw:
778.828.9165 | [email protected]
This is an analysis prepared by West Coast Environmental Law and Ecojustice to summarize how the changes that the Harper government proposes will affect environmental protection in Canada.
Read the full original document at the WCEL website
Read “Why the Budget Act is bad news for fish”
What Bill C-38 means for the environment
1. Changes to the Fisheries Act mean that the law may no longer protect all fish and
the waters where they live.
The new protection framework could exclude many fish and watercourses. Generally,
habitat protection will only include permanent alteration or destruction of “commercial,
recreational or aboriginal fisher(ies)” habitat and some activities will be exempt from the
law regardless of how much damage they cause. The federal government will also be
able to hand over the power to authorize destruction of fish habitat to provincial
governments or other entities, which is worrisome.
2. No maximum time limits on permits allowing impacts on species at risk.
This means that there will no longer be any guaranteed review to evaluate ongoing
impacts to endangered species. These potential ‘perpetual’ permits could continue even
where there is a drastic decline in the population of a species affected by the permitted
activity.
3. The National Energy Board (NEB) will be exempted from species at risk
protections.
The NEB will no longer have to ensure that measures have been taken to minimize
impacts on the critical habitat of at-risk species before the NEB approves a pipeline or
other major infrastructure. For example, there is no guarantee that an environmental
assessment will consider the impacts of a proposed pipeline project and related oil
tanker traffic on the habitat of endangered orca whales before the NEB issues a
certificate approving that pipeline.
4. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act is being replaced with a new Act
that will significantly narrow the number of projects that will be assessed for their
environmental, social and economic impacts.
Assessments, when they happen, will be less rigorous and subject to time limits that will
place further constraints on public and First Nations’ participation. The new Act will apply
only to “designated projects,” but we don’t yet know what those will be. The new Act
gives the Environment Minister and government officials broad decision-making power:
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency would be able to exempt a
designated project from even going through the assessment process.
5. The federal government is offloading responsibilities to the provinces.
This is troubling because the patchwork of environmental laws and policies at the
provincial level leave doubt as to whether they can act as a sufficient or legally
defensible substitute for federal oversight. Prime examples of this offloading include
shifting responsibility for implementation or enforcement of the Fisheries Act to provinces
and eliminating many federal environmental assessments.
6. Cabinet is now granted authority to override a “no” decision of the National
Energy Board.
This may allow politics of the day to trump an independent, objective process and
undermine the NEB’s expertise.
7. No more joint review panels.
Where a major energy project will be subject to an NEB hearing, a Canadian
Environmental Assessment Agency-enabled review panel is prohibited, so there will be
no more joint review panels. Thus, the environmental implications of major energy
projects will now be evaluated only by the energy regulator.
8. Broad decision-making powers are being shifted from the public realm and given to Cabinet and individual Ministers.
This means decisions related to fish habitat protection and environmental assessments
will be allowed to be made behind closed doors with minimal public scrutiny.
9. Significant narrowing of public engagement in resource review panel hearings,
particularly for major oil projects, pipelines and mines.
In order to participate, people will have to prove they will be directly affected or have
relevant information or expertise. In some cases, their contributions may still be ignored.
10. Repeal of two important environmental laws.
The repeal of the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act, means no more domestic
accountability measures on climate change and the repeal of the National Round Table
on Environment and Economy Act will phase out this valuable advisory body completely.
We know from other such panel visitations in the past, that the quasi-judicial JRP process is an exercise in pretty raw governmental power. There are massive sets of rules and regulations, arbitrary procedures and technical requirements. Unless you are a lawyer, it’s not the most comfortable of circumstances. At face value, the purpose of the JRP is to gather evidence. But, inevitably, if you find yourself on the negative side of a proponent who is being outright supported by the federal government, it’s difficult not to see yourself forced into the position of supplicant – pleading, imploring, offering evidence and testimony in your own defence.
It’s tough to maintain a centre of dignity and integrity in a situation like that. But then, people around here have always been very good at absorbing issues of power and, always respectfully, moving forward through an entirely different axis of action. This is the history of politics on Haida Gwaii.
Read the whole entry here.
]]>
Some 50 people occupy the seats at this end of the gymnasium – hereditary chiefs, elected leaders, witnesses, and elders, all of them observing the events. The remainder of the space is row seating and bleachers, where 400+ islanders also listen attentively, as speakers share their stories with the panel – how they learned to fish, to harvest seaweed, to hunt. How these activities are essential to who they are, to their survival. Songs and stories are shared, detailing how Haida culture has continuously evolved along with the ocean for millennia.
Excerpt from a blog posting by Mike Ambach WWF-Canada
View the WWF Blog Posting: In Haida Gwaii, BC, culture evolves with the ocean
There were rough spots: the interruptive policing of what people could say, and could not say, throughout the community (non-CHN) portions of the hearing; who was allowed to speak and who was not; and the clear perception of the Enbridge lawyer being a back seat driver.
From Blue Sky Haida Gwaii blog
View The way we live now
Among 10 of CoASt’s witnesses were a group of 6-year olds who “spoke for all 5 and 6-year-olds on Haida Gwaii”. The young leaders told the Panel, “the beach is our playground, and we want to protect it.”
CoASt’s last presenter, 14-year-old Jesse Condrotte, came with an important message about his rights. “According to the Declaration of Human Rights, us as human beings are allowed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Soon after, Mr. Condrotte was interrupted by Ms. Leggett who asserted that Jesse’s testimony was argument and did not fit within the Panel’s (conveniently fluid) definition of ‘Oral Evidence’.
From the Friends of Wild Salmon Blog, by Valine Crist
View DAY TEN & ELEVEN: OLD MASSETT
And lastly, “The Full Testimony Of Jesse After Being Cut Off At Enbridge Joint Review Panel Hearings” on CoASt’s YouTube channel:
[youtube:http://youtu.be/orHucyy_ho4] ]]>[CORRECTION: NEW DATES]
Old Masset Community Hall: 28, 29 February 2012, Starting at 9:00 am
Skidegate Community Hall: 21, 22 March 2012, Starting at 9:00 am
]]>